Response to commentary on “Is NHST logically flawed”
نویسندگان
چکیده
منابع مشابه
PSYCHOLOGY MUST MOVE BEYOND FLAWED NHST PRACTICES Psychology is addicted to null hypothesis significance testing (NHST), despite decades
Psychology remains addicted to null hypothesis significance testing despite decades of effort by reformers. Extensive changes in statistical understanding and practices are needed. The authors propose a model of reform—the statistical re-education of psychology—by making an analogy with the conceptual change model of learning. Four diverse components of reform are identified, and illustrated by...
متن کاملFlawed meta-analysis of a flawed literature: commentary on Versteeg et al.
Should authors review and synthesize results of their own studies in meta-analyses? Properly done, meta-analyses provide independent, quantitative assessments not only of overall effect sizes found in a literature, but of the quality and limitations of contributing studies, and the nature and sources of variations in effect size. Avoidance of bias in this process is considered paramount. The Co...
متن کاملResponse to Stampfer Commentary
Steve Hickey, Hilary Roberts The Cochrane review by Douglas et al. [1], which is referenced in the Best Practice article by Douglas and Hemilä [2], covers 60 years of research into vitamin C and the common cold. However, the review omits pharmacokinetic data that invalidate the conclusion that vitamin C is ineffective. This conclusion is not derivable from the data presented. The dual-phase pha...
متن کاملAuthors Response to Commentary
AUTHORS’ RESPONSE Although the initial diagnosis of appendicitis remains a clinical one, laparoscopy has gone some way in aiding management of acute right iliac fossa pain. However, even this remains fallible with a number of normal looking appendices being proven histologically to be inflammed. The significance of this level of inflammation remains controversial, and indeed our study showed no...
متن کاملCommentary: flawed science delays smelter cleanup and worsens health.
For 6,000 years, humans have known about smelter hazards. Yet these metals threats continue. Why? This commentary provides one preliminary answer. It (1) summarizes the history of smelter pollution and (2) suggests that at least 3 problems-especially flawed smelter-polluter science-allow continuing health threats. It (3) illustrates this flawed science by using one of the most dangerous of U.S....
متن کاملذخیره در منابع من
با ذخیره ی این منبع در منابع من، دسترسی به آن را برای استفاده های بعدی آسان تر کنید
ژورنال
عنوان ژورنال: Scientometrics
سال: 2018
ISSN: 0138-9130,1588-2861
DOI: 10.1007/s11192-018-2818-3